Tuberville was right about the BCS: it discriminates against the SEC. Think about the SEC this year: everyone says it is the best conference because Tennessee, LSU, Auburn, Florida, and Georgia (all in the top 15 all season; at one point most of them were in the top ten) are in it. Beyond them, the mediocre teams this year (Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi, South Carolina) could probably beat the top teams in many of the other conferences (Arkansas might should be in the top group but I am strictly going on rank there). The problem is that all of these powerhouses beat up on one another (see my Pyrrhic Victory and Defeat post). Put any of the top 5 teams listed above in another conference and they would have a much better chance of going undefeated and going to the BCS championship game. As it is, Auburn already beat LSU, Florida is currently beating LSU, Tennessee and Georgia square off tonight, later in the season Auburn and Georgia will square off, etc. Basically, to win out, one top ten team must beat 2 or 3 other top ten games in the regular season, then beat another one (or one they have previously beaten) in the SEC championship game, and then beat a non-conference top ten team in a bowl game. In a given season, a national champion from the SEC would have to win what would be 3 or 4 bowl games for most other teams. In between these games, they will also play 2-4 other teams ranked in the top 25 or which would be ranked in the top 25 if they had not been beaten by the top teams in the conference. It would be different if they could have Notre Dame's schedule of playing Michigan, Michigan State, USC but also Army, Navy, Air Force, and 3 or 4 other teams that the mediocre teams in the SEC would manhandle. Basically, they (and USC for that matter), play 3 or 4 games a year and have scrimmages with spectators in between. Their road to an undefeated season is markedly different than anyone's in the SEC.
Add to this a new phenomenon: ESPN's almost unabashed politicing against the SEC. Before you just call me bitter because they put GameDay at #2 USC v. #19 Nebraska instead of at #3 Auburn v. #6 LSU (no bias there, USC was obviously the better game considering they were favored by 18 and Auburn was favored by 3), consider who ESPN's analysts are: Corso (FSU fan), Herbstreit (Ohio State player), Rocket Ishmael (Notre Dame player), Mark May (Pitt player), Lou Holtz (long time Notre Dame head coach and FIRED South Carolina coach) and you can fill in the rest. The closest they come to having a commentator from the SEC on GameDay is when Charles Barkley (Auburn BASKETBALL player) is on. I used to watch GameDay religiously because it was the best college football show and played it pretty straight. However, in the last few years, especially since the BCS was instituted, they clearly have an agenda that is to promote conferences other than the SEC.
I believe there are a few possible solutions here: 1) institute a playoff (best possible solution); 2) eliminate the automatic bids for conference champions to the BCS and let #1 play #2, #3 play #4, etc. in the BCS rankings (still have the problem that SEC teams will beat each other and take hits in the rankings when other teams will cake walk to an undefeated season but its better than the current system); 3) do away with the BCS and go back to the old bowl system.
I don't usually whine an complain about things like the BCS, but I don't see any real way for an SEC team to ever win under it, even if they are the best team in the country. This year I am going to root for Florida for the remainder of the year (even though I am not a Florida fan) because they are the only SEC team with a chance to prove me wrong. Even if they win out, I am not sure they will make the championship game (my money is they won't because USC is a darling of ESPN and will be pushed as the second best team until they lose which they are unlikely to do and, if they do lose, ESPN will immediately jump on the West Virginia band wagon).
Another idea I had was for the SEC to immediately disband into 12 independent teams. Each year, the top 5 SEC schools should schedule to play USC, Notre Dame, and West Virginia each year back to back. The other games on their schedule should be 6 powder puffs (maybe the middle teams in the ACC, Big East, PAC 10, Big 12, and Big 10) and a few teams ranked in the top 25 (lower end of the top 25). A few things would happen: a) USC, Notre Dame, and West Virginia would not be undefeated most years; b) the SEC schools would be higher ranked by not beating each other up and having glorified scrimmages like other schools half of the year; c) ESPN might consider them on the same level with USC and West Virginia because they would no longer be in the SEC.
In conclusion: Go Gators (dang that hurts but desperate times call for desperate measures).